Scientific Committees
Scientific Committee on Food
Outcome of discussions
Minutes of the
126
th Plenary Meeting of the Scientific Committee
on Food held on 27/28 February 2001, Brussels
ATTENDANCE LIST LISTE DES PARTICIPANTS
TEILNEHMERLISTE
Members/Membres/Mitglieder
Mrs. S. BARLOW First Vice chair, Mr. A.
CARERE, K-H. ENGEL, A. FLYNN present on 28/2, W. GRUNOW, T.
HIRVI, Mrs. A. KNAAP Chair, Mr. J.C. LARSEN, S. LINDGREN,
B. Moseley, A. PALOU Second Vice chair, J. SCHLATTER, P.
TOBBACK, P. VERGER, J.-M. WAL, R. WALKER
Apologies for absence:
J. ALEXANDER, B. KOLETZKO, W.
SARIS
Commission/Kommission
Mr. L. ROSSI (DG Health and Consumer
Protection), M. SLAYNE (DG Health and Consumer
Protection)
Secretariat/Secrétariat/Sekretariat
(DG Health and Consumer Protection)
Mr. M.A. GRANERO ROSELL, D. PETTAUER, D.
LIEM, M. ROMARÍS, Mrs. H. PEDERSEN
1.
Apologies for absence
The apologies were noted.
2. Adoption of the agenda
The draft agenda was adopted.
3. Declarations of interest
Prof. Engel declared a potential
conflict of interest in relation to the item cassia gum
(new dossier) as he had been involved three years before in
research on interaction of cassia gum with
flavourings.
The Secretariat requested members to
declare their possible interests again when cassia gum will
be discussed in detail in the future. The SCF or its
Working Groups will then have the opportunity to decide
whether the interest declared could compromise the
independence of the members, and therefore would prevent
them from participating in the discussion. At the present
meeting no discussion on any aspect of the dossier took
place.
One member enquired about the status of
information directly sent to individual members by
industry. The secretariat and the Chair reminded that the
only way to submit information for the attention of the
Committee was to submit the information via the
Secretariat.
4. New dossiers
- carbon monoxide (food additive)
- cassia gum (food additive)
- benzyl alcohol
- revision of scientific basis of essential
requirements of infant formulae and follow-on
formulae
The following new dossiers have been
added to the working programme of the Committee:
Carbon monoxide has received a temporary national
authorisation as a food additive. The Commission services
have received a dossier through the national authority. The
Committee is asked to evaluate the safety of carbon
monoxide as a packaging gas for meat products in a mixture
with carbon dioxide and nitrogen.
The Committee is asked to consider the
safety of
cassia gum to be used as a food additive, as a
gelling agent and as a thickener.
The Commission services have received a
request to evaluate
benzyl alcohol as a carrier solvent for flavouring
substances. Benzyl alcohol is included in the Community
register of chemically defined flavouring substances.
Detailed terms of reference will be prepared by the
Commission services at a later stage.
The Community adopted harmonised rules
on
infant formulae and follow-on formulae (Commission
Directive 91/321 EEC) in 1991. Such rules include essential
requirements for these products. These essential
requirements were based on a number of reports of the SCF.
It has now become necessary to review and update the
scientific basis of the above Community legislation, taking
into account scientific and technical developments. The
Committee is asked to revise
the essential requirements of infant formulae and
follow-on formulae intended for the feeding of infants and
young children. Following a request by a petitioner,
the Committee is also requested, in the context of that
review, to address specifically the issue of the nucleotide
content of these products. The Committee is also asked to
give attention to fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS) and
galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS) in infant formulae.
The appropriate Working Groups will
begin their work on these dossiers in due course and will
report to the plenary.
The Chair of the SCF stressed the
importance to have clear requests submitted by the
Commission in order for the Committee to work
efficiently.
5. SCF Working Programme
The Secretariat distributed an updated
list of the existing dossiers in the working programme of
the Committee.
In the area of contaminants, the
Committee is examining some aspects of the chemical
specifications of gelatine and the group consideration of
the fusarium toxins (some of them have been recently
evaluated individually by the Committee). The Committee
will also re-evaluate its previous opinions on lead,
cadmium, mercury and arsenic, and assess Polycyclic
Aromatic Hydrocarbons and organotin compounds in food.
These requests to the SCF are done in the framework of a
proposal for a Draft Commission Regulation setting maximum
levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs. This also
includes the mandate for the presently ongoing
re-evaluation of 3-MCPD.
In the area of Hygiene and Microbiology
the Committee is about to finalise the establishment of a
risk profile for the microbiological contamination of
fruits and vegetables eaten raw. The Committee is also
working in the development of criteria for the safety
evaluation of additives produced by microbiological
processes.
In the field of food additives, the
Committee is considering at present two applications for
additional sweeteners: neotame and erythritol. Other
questions relate to the evaluation of impurities in the
specifications on ethyl hydroxyethyl cellulose, of n-vinyl
pyrrolidone, carnauba wax and hydrogenated poly-1-decene.
The Committee is also working on the update of the
guidelines on food additives. For a larger number of
additional dossiers the Committee is awaiting information
from petitioners or third parties. These dossiers are
therefore not subject of active consideration at
present.
In the area of flavourings, the
Committee is planning to evaluate 200 flavourings of the
Community Register of chemically defined flavourings per
year according to the evaluation programme laid down in
Commission Regulation 1565/2000. The Committee will also
consider appropriate methods for the exposure assessment
for flavours in food in the framework of this programme.
The work of the SCF in this area also includes the
evaluation 15 substances for possible inclusion in Annex II
of Directive 88/388, and a safety evaluation of certain
substances used as butter fat tracers.
The work programme of the Committee in
the area of food contact materials has been ongoing for
three years and comprises the evaluation of about 50 -70
compounds per year.
The working programme also includes the
updating of the SCF guidelines on irradiation.
In the area of novel foods and novel
processes, the Committee is considering the following
dossiers: fractions of cereal brans as fat replacers,
genetically modified green hearted chicory, genetically
modified Radicchio rosso, and the genetically modified
maize lines GA21 and BT11. In most of the cases the
Committee has requested additional information and it is
awaiting it to pursue the evaluation. The Committee also is
working to update its guidelines on novel foods.
In the area of nutrition and dietetic
foods, the Committee is engaged in establishing the Upper
Levels for the remaining 20 vitamins and minerals of the 29
planned.
There are also a number of nutritional
substances that may be used in the manufacture of dietetic
foods that are being considered by the SCF. It is envisaged
that the Committee will develop guidelines for the safety
evaluation of these compounds including guidance on data
requirements.
6. Co-ordination with the Scientific Steering
Committee and the other scientific committees
6.1. Feed-back by the Chair on subjects
discussed in the SSC which are of interest to the
Committee
The Chair reported that the renewed SSC
intended to emphasize its activities in this mandate in
areas related to corrdination of the Scientific
Committees.
The Committee discussed the
co-ordination of issues that involve the attention of more
than one Scientific Committee. It was generally felt that
for a fruitful co-operation between different SC's good
communication between the chairs, the members and the
respective Secretariats is needed.
6.2. Feed-back by members of the
Committee having attended working group meetings of other
Scientific Committees
The members attending the different
Working Groups of the SSC and other sister committees were
confirmed.
6.3. Discussion on the involvement of
SCF members to contribute to work of the SSC and other
SCs
The additional significant workload
involved in the contribution to the activities of the SSC
and other SCs was acknowledged but it was agreed it was
important to involve the SCF in this cross-sector
issues.
6.4. Contribution by the SCF to
harmonisation of risk assessment procedures, Opinion of the
Scientific Steering Committee on harmonisation of risk
assessment procedures
The Committee acknowledged the enormous
amount of effort carried out by the SSC in this
exercise.
The Committee exchanged views about ways
to contribute to this exercise. It was agreed that a fuller
discussion o the content of the SSC report should be
scheduled for the next SCF Plenary, focusing on points that
need to be followed up from the recommendations.
7. Rules of procedure of the SCF
The rules of procedure adopted by the
previous membership of the SCF had been discussed at the
first meeting under the new mandate of the SCF on 4
December. Following these discussions a small number of
changes were introduced and the revised rules were
adopted.
8. General information from the Commission services on
matters relevant to the SCF
- FOSIE presentation by DG RESEARCH
The presentation by Dr Boenke, from the
Directorate General Research and Development, on the Food
Safety in Europe Concerted Action was well received by the
members.
9. Food Contact Materials
9.1. Draft opinion on the 12th list of
monomers and additives for contact materials
The draft opinion submitted by the
Working Group was examined. The Committee considered that
three substances required further consideration by the
Working Group as new recent information had became
available for one of them (phthalic acid, dibutyl ester,
pm.ref. 74880), and clarification of the evaluation
proposed in relation to earlier evaluations was needed for
the two others (N,N bis(2-hydroxy ethyl) alkyl (C8-18)
amine, pm.ref. 39090, and N,N-bis (2-hydroxyethyl)alkyl
C8-18 amine hydrochlorides, pm.ref. 39120. The evaluation
of the remaining substances on the list was adopted subject
to editorial changes and clarification of the wording of
the evaluation.
The full opinion is attached to these
minutes as Annex I.
The chair of the Food Contact Materials
Working Group informed the Committee that the Working Group
had had a joint discussion with microbiologists of the SCF
and SCVPH on a number of biocidal substances for which
there were petitions to the Commission to approve their
addition to food contact materials. It had become apparent
that guidelines need to be prepared to establish the data
requirements for the safety evaluation of these substances.
These guidelines will be prepared in close co-operation
with the Food Microbiology and Hygiene Working
Group.
10. Food additives
- Discussion and possible adoption of a draft opinion
on hydrogenated poly-1-decene
The chair of the Additives Working Group
reported that new information had became available at a
meeting the previous week, and that further additional
information was going to be supplied by the petitioner in
the near future. The draft opinion was therefore referred
back to the Working Group for examination of the new
information.
11. Nutrition/dietetic foods
The Working Group on Nutrition had
discussed the alternatives for updating the Population
Reference Intakes of the 31
st report of the SCF (Nutrient and Energy
Intakes for the European Community) of 1993. The Committee
noted that such an update was a huge task, considered to be
even bigger than the exercise on Upper Levels. It was felt
that this task should be planned very carefully in order to
efficiently use the work already carried out and to avoid
duplications of efforts. The possibility of using the
Scientific Cooperation system (SCOOP) had also been
considered. The Working Group had decided to examine the
exercises carried out recently on the same subject in
several Member States in order to identify similarities and
differences at a meeting scheduled for June.
On questions by members, the Secretariat
indicated that for the moment there was no mandate by the
Commission services on this activity and that the
Commission services will report to the Committee on this at
a later stage.
12. Upper Levels of Vitamins and Minerals
The Task Force had met once since the
new membership of the Committee. Additional draft opinions
on upper levels of the remaining vitamins and minerals will
be submitted by the Group for consideration in coming SCF
plenaries.
The Secretariat distributed a
compilation of the opinions already adopted by the
Committee for ease of reference.
13. Schedule of SCF meetings for 2001
The meetings of most Working Groups were
now scheduled for the whole year 2001.
14. Any other business
- follow-up of opinion on dioxins
The Committee was aware that new
scientific information on the toxicity of dioxins has
become available since the adoption of its opinion on the
risk assessment of dioxins in food in November 2000.
The Secretariat explained that the
Commission had recently received comments on the
toxicological evaluation of dioxins by the SCF from the
Swedish National Food Administration and the Scientific
Committee of the Norwegian Food Control Authority. While
the Swedish comments related exclusively to the
availability of new scientific information, the Norwegian
document also based its considerations on a different
interpretation of the toxicological information already
considered by the SCF. In addition, some members of the
SCF's sister Committee on Toxicity, Ecotoxicity and the
Environment (CSTEE) had wished to express their
views.
Due to the sensitivity of the issue an
ad hoc group of SCF members and experts in the field of
dioxin risk assessment had been convened on 26
th February on short notice to consider the new
scientific information and the comments received. In order
to give the opportunity to explain their views, a
representative of the Norwegian Committee (Prof Dr E.
Dybing), and a member of the CSTEE (Prof Dr H. Greim) had
been invited.
The SCF
ad hoc working group reported to the Plenary that
had discussed the new data and all views in detail. The SCF
group had concluded to propose to the SCF plenary that the
new scientific information published recently would need to
be reflected in the toxicological evaluation of the
SCF.
This course of action was generally
agreed by the SCF. However, the Committee expressed its
concern about the urgency, as the opinion had been adopted
just recently and new scientific information will
continuously become available.
The SCF agreed that, given the
complexity of the issue and to assure coherence and
consistency with the present opinion, sufficient time
should be given to reconsider the toxicological evaluation
in the SCF opinion. A small group was therefore charged to
prepare a draft to be considered at the next plenary
meeting.
The Secretariat explained that, given
the outcome of the present discussion, the Commission might
come back to the Committee soon to request an urgent
response on this sensitive matter.
Corrigendum to the Report of the
Scientific Committee on Food on composition and
specification of food intended to meet the
expenditure of intense muscular effort, especially
for sportsmen opinion on foods for sportsmen
|
The Committee was made aware of a
material mistake in the "Report of the Scientific Committee
on Food on composition and specification of food intended
to meet the expenditure of intense muscular effort,
especially for sportsmen", adopted by the SCF on 22 June
2000. Under the section on requirements for
"Carbohydrate-electrolyte solutions (CES)", the report
states that "these beverages should contain not less than
80 kcal/
100 ml and not more than 350 kcal/
100 ml". This range is repeated in the Executive
Summary. These figures should correctly be expressed per
1000 ml and not per 100 ml. The Committee agrees to
correct this figure and modify the published report
accordingly. The corrected version of the report is
attached to these minutes as annex II. It replaces the
previously published report.
15. Adoption of this minutes
These minutes were adopted by written
procedure.
(The text of the opinions adopted in
these annexes appear in the section outcome/opinions of the
web pages of the SCF on the Internet, not in the section
outcome/minutes).
1.
Opinion
of the Scientific Committee on Food on the 12th
additional list of monomers and additives for food contact
materials SCF/CS/PM/M84 final
2.
Report
of the Scientific Committee on Food on composition
and specification of food intended to meet the expenditure
of intense muscular effort, especially for sportsmen
(Adopted by the SCF on 22/6/2000, corrected on 28/2/2001)
SCF/CS/NUT/SPORT/5 Final corrected
Scientific Committees
Scientific Committee on Food
FOOD SAFETY |
PUBLIC HEALTH
|
CONSUMER
PROTECTION |
DIRECTORATE
GENERAL "HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION"
|