Archive:Social inclusion statistics

Data extracted in February 2016. Most recent data: Further Eurostat information, Main tables and Database. Planned article update: January 2017.

Table 1: Population at-risk-of-poverty or social exclusion, 2009–14
Source: Eurostat (ilc_peps01)

Figure 1: Number of persons at-risk-of-poverty or social exclusion analysed by type of risks, EU-28, 2014 (¹)
(million)
Source: Eurostat (ilc_pees01)

Figure 2: Proportion of the population at-risk-of-poverty or social exclusion, 2014 (¹)
(%)
Source: Eurostat (ilc_pees01) and (ilc_li02)

Figure 3: At-risk-of-poverty rate and threshold, 2014
Source: Eurostat (ilc_li01) and (ilc_li02)

Figure 4: Material deprivation rate — proportion of persons who cannot afford to pay for selected items, 2014
(%)
Source: Eurostat (ilc_sip8)

Figure 5: People aged less than 60 living in households with very low work intensity, 2013–14
(%)
Source: Eurostat (ilc_lvhl11)

Social inclusion has long been a key part of the European Union‘s (EU) policies. The overriding goal of EU policy in this area is to reduce substantially the number of people at-risk-of-poverty or social exclusion, thereby creating a more inclusive society.

However, as multi-dimensional concepts, poverty and social exclusion cannot easily be measured through statistics. As a result, both monetary and non-monetary indicators have been developed, such as the at-risk-of-poverty rate, the at-risk-of-poverty threshold, the severe material deprivation rate and the share of people living in households with very low work intensity. There is a range of other indicators that are equally relevant when analysing social inclusion, for example: access to education and training, health, or housing.

Main statistical findings

At-risk-of-poverty or social exclusion

The situation in 2014

In 2014, there were 122 million people in the EU-28, equivalent to 24.5 % of the entire population, who lived in households facing poverty or social exclusion (see Table 1). Compared with 2013, the number of people at-risk-of-poverty or social exclusion in 2014 had decreased by 564 thousand, equivalent to a 0.1 percentage point decrease in the share of the total population.

The results for the EU-28 — calculated as a weighted average of the national results — conceal considerable variations between EU Member States. In Romania (40.2 %) and Bulgaria (40.1 %), close to two fifths of the population were considered to be at-risk-of-poverty or social exclusion in 2014, while in Greece (36.0 %) the proportion was more than one third of the population. Over a quarter of the population was considered to be at-risk-of-poverty or social exclusion in 10 other EU Member States in 2014, namely Latvia, Hungary, Croatia, Spain, Italy, Portugal, Ireland, Cyprus, Lithuania and Estonia. Among the non-member countries (shown in Table 1), the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (43.2 %) and Serbia (43.1 %) reported even higher proportions of their respective populations at-risk-of-poverty or social exclusion.

The EU Member States with the lowest proportions of their populations considered to be at-risk-of-poverty or social exclusion in 2014 were the Czech Republic (14.8 %), the Netherlands (16.5 %), Sweden (16.9 %) and Finland (17.3 %); Iceland (11.2 %), Norway (13.5 %) and Switzerland (16.3 %, 2013 data) also reported relatively low shares of their respective populations as being at-risk-of-poverty or social exclusion.

In 2014, there were 17.1 million persons at-risk-of-poverty or social exclusion in Italy, 16.5 million in Germany, 15.2 million in the United Kingdom, 13.4 million in Spain, 11.5 million in France, 9.3 million in Poland and 8.5 million in Romania; these were the seven highest levels among the EU Member States and together they accounted for nearly three quarters (74.9 %) of the EU-28 total. In each of the remaining Member States, the number of persons at-risk-of-poverty or social exclusion was less than 4.0 million.

Developments between 2013 and 2014 show that the proportion of the population at-risk-of-poverty or social exclusion fell in half of the EU Member States, most notably in Hungary (-3.7 percentage points) and Lithuania (-3.5 percentage points); although the fall in Hungary was greater (-7.9 percentage points), there is a break in series. Three Member States — Luxembourg, Portugal and Slovenia — reported no change in the proportion of their populations at-risk-of-poverty. The remaining 11 Member States reported an increase in their share of persons at-risk-of-poverty or social exclusion during 2014. The two largest increases were in Spain (1.9 percentage points) and Finland (1.3 percentage points); Estonia reported a larger increase (2.5 percentage points), but again there is a break in series.

In absolute terms, developments between 2013 and 2014 in Spain Germany and France had the greatest upward impact on the number of persons considered to be at-risk-of-poverty or social exclusion in the EU-28 as a whole, with increases of 772 thousand in Spain and just under 300 thousand in Germany and France. By contrast, excluding Bulgaria which had a break in series, the largest decreases in the number of persons considered to be at-risk-of-poverty or social exclusion were observed in Poland (-411 thousand), the United Kingdom (-398 thousand) and Hungary (-353 thousand).

Medium-term developments

Looking further back, at the period 2009–14 (see Table 1), the proportion of the EU-27 population that was at-risk-of-poverty or social exclusion grew from 23.3 % in 2009 to 24.7 % in 2012, before falling by 0.3 percentage points between 2012 and 2014. A shorter time series for the EU-28 displays a broadly similar development between 2010 and 2014.

Three of the EU Member States —Denmark, Ireland and Italy — displayed a similar development to that of the EU-27: a relatively low proportion of the population at-risk-of-poverty or social exclusion in 2009; a rising share during the period 2009–12; and falls in 2013 and 2014. Belgium and the Czech Republic showed a similar development, but with the proportion of people at-risk-of-poverty or social exclusion increasing between 2013 and 2014, as did France and Finland, although in these two Member States the proportion had peaked already in 2011 rather than 2012. Equally, the following seven Member States reported a rise from 2009 to 2012, as in the EU-28, but with further rises, either peaking in 2013 or continuing to increase through to 2014: Greece, Spain, Cyprus, Hungary, Malta, Slovenia and the United Kingdom. Austria displayed a particular pattern: the proportion of the population at-risk-of-poverty or social exclusion fell between 2009 and 2010, increased to a peak in 2011, decreased to its lowest level in 2012 and then increased again in 2013 and 2014 when it matched its peak from 2011.

The remaining EU Member States could be divided into two groups: those which recorded in 2014 their highest proportion of the population at-risk-of-poverty or social exclusion for the period 2009–14, namely Germany, Estonia, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal and Sweden; and those which recorded in 2014 their lowest proportion for this period, namely Bulgaria, Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania and Slovakia. Among these seven Member States that recorded in 2014 their lowest proportion for the period 2009–14, the falls between 2009 and 2014 were largest in Bulgaria (-6.1 percentage points, note there is a break in series) and Latvia (-5.2 percentage points). The largest overall increases in the remaining Member States were recorded in Greece (8.4 percentage points), Spain (4.5 percentage points), Cyprus (3.9 percentage points), Malta (3.5 percentage points), Italy (3.4 percentage points) and Slovenia (3.3 percentage points).

Analysis by type of risk

The overall headline figure for the risk of facing poverty or social exclusion is made up of three specific types of risk: being at-risk-of poverty; facing severe material deprivation; and/or living in a household with very low work intensity (see Figure 1). People are considered to be at-risk-of-poverty or social exclusion if they face at least one of these risks — although 33.2 % of those people at-risk-of-poverty or social exclusion within the EU-28 in 2014 faced a combination of two or even all three of these risks.

In 2014, there were 49.0 million people in the EU-28 living in households that faced income poverty (but neither severe material deprivation, nor very low work intensity), 18.6 million persons experiencing severe material deprivation (but neither of the other two risks) and 14.1 million people living in households with very low work intensity (but facing neither of the other two risks). An additional 30.8 million people lived in households facing two out of three of these risks, while a further 9.8 million people lived in households where all three of these risks were present.

Figure 2 provides a simplified analysis for each EU Member State regarding the proportion of the population facing the three risks identified above, showing:

the proportion of people at-risk-of-poverty including those living in households that were exclusively at-risk-of-poverty as well as those at-risk-of-poverty combined with either or both of the other two risks; in the EU-28 this amounted to a total of 86.2 million people in 2014;
the analysis then shows the additional proportion of the population experiencing severe material deprivation (either as a single risk or combined with living in a household with very low work intensity); in the EU-28 this amounted to a total of 22.1 million people in 2014;
the final category shows the proportion of the population living in households that were exclusively characterised as having a very low work intensity (those that were not at-risk-of-poverty, nor experiencing severe material deprivation); in the EU-28 this amounted to a total of 14.1 million people in 2014.

As such, when summing up the three categories shown in Figure 2, the result corresponds to the overall proportion of the population at-risk-of-poverty or social exclusion.

At-risk-of-poverty

In 2014, 17.2 % of the EU-28 population was assessed to be at-risk-of-poverty (see Figure 3) — the monetary dimension of the at-risk-of poverty or social exclusion indicator — with this share ranging from 9.7 % in the Czech Republic to 25.4 % in Romania. Figure 3 also presents an analysis of the at-risk-of-poverty threshold, which is defined as 60 % of median income in each EU Member State — data are adjusted for price differences between countries. At-risk-of-poverty thresholds for 2014 ranged from PPS 2.4 thousand in Romania to PPS 13.0 thousand in Austria, with the threshold in Luxembourg (PPS 17.0 thousand) above this range. Social protection systems impact upon the share of the population that is considered to be at-risk-of-poverty. More information on income and poverty is available in an article on income distribution.

Material deprivation and severe material deprivation

Alongside income-related measures of poverty, a broader perspective of social inclusion/exclusion can be obtained by studying other measures, for example, those relating to material deprivation; this provides an analysis based on absolute numbers rather than the relative measures used for income poverty. The definition of material deprivation is based on the inability to afford a selection of items that are considered to be necessary or desirable, namely: having arrears on mortgage or rent payments, utility bills, hire purchase instalments or other loan payments; not being able to afford one week’s annual holiday away from home; not being able to afford a meal with meat, chicken, fish (or vegetarian equivalent) every second day; not being able to face unexpected financial expenses; not being able to buy a telephone (including mobile phone); not being able to buy a colour television; not being able to buy a washing machine; not being able to buy a car; or not being able to afford heating to keep the house warm.

The material deprivation rate is defined as the proportion of persons who cannot afford at least three out of the nine items specified above, while those who are unable to afford four or more items are considered to be severely materially deprived.

Almost one in five (18.6 %) members of the EU-28 population was materially deprived in 2014, with just under half of these (9.0 % of the total population) being considered as experiencing severe material deprivation (see Figure 4). Among the EU Member States, the proportion of people that were materially deprived was highest in Bulgaria (46.9 %), with more than two thirds of these experiencing severe material deprivation. Similarly, in Romania (44.0 %), Hungary (39.6 %) and Greece (39.5 %), which were the Member States with the next highest material deprivation rates, more than half of those considered as materially-deprived experienced severe material deprivation, as was also the case in Latvia, Italy and Malta.

Less than one in 10 people in Austria, the Netherlands, Luxembourg and the Nordic Member States were materially deprived and in the same EU Member States less than 5.0 % of the entire population was considered to be severely materially deprived (see Figure 4), as was also the case in Iceland, Norway and Switzerland (2013 data).

Work intensity

Being in employment is generally an effective way to insulate oneself from the risk of poverty. The indicator concerning people living in households with a very low work intensity is defined as those people aged less than 60 who are living in households where adults worked less than 20 % of their total work potential during the year prior to the survey; these people are considered to be more likely to be exposed to social exclusion.

In 2014, 11.2 % of the EU-28’s population aged less than 60 lived in households with very low work intensity (see Figure 5), which represented a slight increase when compared with 2013 (10.9 %). In 2014, the proportion of people below the age of 60 living in households with very low work intensity was higher than 14.0 % in Belgium, Croatia, Spain and Greece, while Ireland reported the highest share (21.0 %). The EU Member States that reported the lowest proportions of people living in households with very low work intensity in 2014 included Poland (7.3 %), Slovakia (7.1 %), Romania, Sweden (both 6.4 %) and Luxembourg (6.1 %); Norway (5.9 %), Iceland (4.9 %) and Switzerland (4.1 %, 2013 data) recorded even lower proportions.

The fastest expansion in the proportion of persons aged less than 60 living in households with very low work intensity between 2013 and 2014 was reported in Cyprus (an increase of 1.8 percentage points), followed by France (1.5 percentage points), Spain (1.4 percentage points) and Austria (1.3 percentage points).

Data sources and availability

EU statistics on income and living conditions (EU-SILC) are the source of information for statistics relating to income, living conditions and social inclusion, in both monetary and non-monetary terms, for households and individuals. More information on EU-SILC, the calculation of household disposable income, as well as the calculation of household size using the number of ‘equivalent adults’, is provided in an article on income distribution statistics.

Context

At the Laeken European Council in December 2001, European heads of state and government endorsed a first set of common statistical indicators relating to social exclusion and poverty that were subject to a continuing process of refinement by an indicators sub-group that is part of the Social Protection Committee. These indicators are an essential element in the open method of coordination (OMC) to monitor the progress of EU Member States in the fight against poverty and social exclusion. In May 2006, the Social Protection Committee adopted a portfolio of overarching indicators complemented by specific indicators on social inclusion, pensions and health.

‘The European platform against poverty and social exclusion: a European framework for social and territorial cohesion’ (COM(2010) 758 final) is one of the seven flagship initiatives of the Europe 2020 strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth adopted in 2010. The goals are to:

ensure economic, social and territorial cohesion;
guarantee respect for the fundamental rights of people experiencing poverty and social exclusion, and enable them to live in dignity and take an active part in society;
mobilise support to help people integrate in the communities where they live, get training and help them to find a job and have access to social benefits.

In the context of the Europe 2020 strategy, the European Council adopted in June 2010 a headline target on social inclusion: for the EU as a whole to have at least 20 million fewer people at-risk-of poverty or social exclusion by 2020. EU-SILC is the source for this indicator concerning people at-risk-of-poverty or social exclusion which combines three sub-indicators: the at-risk-of-poverty rate, severe material deprivation rate and people living in households with very low work intensity.

One leading initiative, in respect to the Europe 2020 headline target, has been a Communication of the European Commission relating to a series of ‘national Roma integration strategies’ (COM(2012) 226 final). The strategies seek to highlight the situation of the Roma — considered to be Europe’s largest minority group, of which there are thought to be between 10 and 12 million persons — and to ensure a tangible improvement in relation to their integration and inclusion in society. Proposed measures aim to highlight the fight against poverty and social exclusion, raise employment levels, and reduce school drop-out rates, all three of which are headline targets within the Europe 2020 strategy.

Further Eurostat information

Publications

Statistical books

News releases and statistics in focus

The risk of poverty or social exclusion affected 1 in 4 persons in the EU in 2014 — News release
More than 120 million persons at risk of poverty or social exclusion in 2013 — News release
Non-EU citizens twice as likely to be at risk of poverty or social exclusion as nationals in 2013 — News release
Living standards falling in most Member States — Statistics in focus 8/2013
Children were the age group at the highest risk of poverty or social exclusion in 2011 — Statistics in focus 4/2013
In 2009 a 6.5 % rise in per capita social protection expenditure matched a 6.1 % drop in EU-27 GDP — Statistics in focus 14/2012
23 % of EU citizens were at risk of poverty or social exclusion in 2010 — Statistics in focus 9/2012

Main tables

Income and living conditions (t_ilc)

Database

Income and living conditions (ilc)

People at risk of poverty or social exclusion (Europe 2020 strategy) (ilc_pe)

Income distribution and monetary poverty (ilc_ip)

Living conditions (ilc_lv)

Material deprivation (ilc_md)

EU-SILC ad-hoc modules (ilc_ahm)

Dedicated section

Methodology / Metadata

Income and living conditions (ESMS metadata file — ilc_esms)
Individual employment, household employment and risk of poverty in the EU — A decomposition analysis — 2013 edition
Standard error estimation for the EU-SILC indicators of poverty and social exclusion — 2013 edition
Statistical matching of EU-SILC and the Household Budget Survey to compare poverty estimates using income, expenditures and material deprivation — 2013 edition
What can be learned from deprivation indicators in Europe?

Source data for tables and figures (MS Excel)

Social inclusion: tables and figures

Other information

Regulation (EC) No 1177/2003 of 16 June 2003 concerning EU statistics on income and living conditions (EU-SILC)
Regulation (EC) No 1553/2005 of 7 September 2005 amending Regulation 1177/2003 concerning EU statistics on income and living conditions (EU-SILC)
Regulation (EC) No 1791/2006 of 20 October 2006 adapting certain Regulations ... in the fields of ... statistics ..., by reason of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania

External links